<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Handy List of Influential Content Resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leenjones.com/2009/04/influential-content-resources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leenjones.com/2009/04/influential-content-resources/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on influence and content strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.leenjones.com/2009/04/influential-content-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leenjones.com/blog/?p=467#comment-2179</guid>
		<description>Hey CM!
I am going to cheat and answer you by recommending 2:

&gt; Argumentation: The Study of Effective Reasoning because it is a nice bridge between the academic and practical. 

&gt; Persuasive Technology because it demonstrates well how persuasion and rhetoric apply in the technology space. It isn&#039;t as focused on content, though.

CJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey CM!<br />
I am going to cheat and answer you by recommending 2:</p>
<p>> Argumentation: The Study of Effective Reasoning because it is a nice bridge between the academic and practical. </p>
<p>> Persuasive Technology because it demonstrates well how persuasion and rhetoric apply in the technology space. It isn&#8217;t as focused on content, though.</p>
<p>CJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CM</title>
		<link>http://www.leenjones.com/2009/04/influential-content-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>CM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leenjones.com/blog/?p=467#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>If I have time to read just one of the things under Rhetoric, which one should I read?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I have time to read just one of the things under Rhetoric, which one should I read?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Espinosa</title>
		<link>http://www.leenjones.com/2009/04/influential-content-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Espinosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leenjones.com/blog/?p=467#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>What a far-ranging list. But I think to get the right content for varied situations, you need people who can weave together concepts from seemingly disparate fields. I&#039;d better start reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a far-ranging list. But I think to get the right content for varied situations, you need people who can weave together concepts from seemingly disparate fields. I&#8217;d better start reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
